Lipid profile and response to statin therapy in patients with hypopituitarism.

OBJECTIVE: Dyslipidemia is prevalent among patients with hypopituitarism, especially in those with growth hormone (GH) deficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the response to statin therapy among adult patients with dyslipidemia and hypopituitarism. METHODS: A total of 113 patients with hypopituitarism following up at a neuroendocrinology unit were evaluated for serum lipid levels. Dyslipidemia was diagnosed in 72 (63.7%) of these patients. A control group included 57 patients with dyslipidemia and normal pituitary function. The distribution of gender, age, weight, and dyslipidemia type was well balanced across both groups, and all participants were treated with simvastatin at doses adjusted to obtain normal lipid levels. RESULTS: Patients with hypopituitarism and dyslipidemia presented deficiency of TSH (69%), gonadotropins (69%), ACTH (64%), and GH (55%) and had a similar number of deficient pituitary axes compared with patients with hypopituitarism but without dyslipidemia. All patients with dyslipidemia (with and without hypopituitarism) had lipid levels well controlled with doses of simvastatin ranging from 20-40 mg/day. The mean daily dose of simvastatin was not significantly different between patients with and without hypopituitarism (26.7 versus 23.5 mg, p = 0.10). Similarly, no significant variation in simvastatin dose was observed between patients with different causes of hypopituitarism, presence or absence of GH deficiency, number of deficient pituitary axes, prior pituitary radiation therapy or not, and presence or absence of obesity. CONCLUSION: Patients with GH deficiency without GH replacement showed good response to simvastatin at a mean dose equivalent to that used in individuals with dyslipidemia and normal pituitary function.

Lipid profile and response to statin therapy in patients with hypopituitarism

ABSTRACT Objective: Dyslipidemia is prevalent among patients with hypopituitarism, especially in those with growth hormone (GH) deficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the response to statin therapy among adult patients with dyslipidemia and hypopituitarism. Subjects and methods: A total of 113 patients with hypopituitarism following up at a neuroendocrinology unit were evaluated for serum lipid levels. Dyslipidemia was diagnosed in 72 (63.7%) of these patients. A control group included 57 patients with dyslipidemia and normal pituitary function. The distribution of gender, age, weight, and dyslipidemia type was well balanced across both groups, and all participants were treated with simvastatin at doses adjusted to obtain normal lipid levels. Results: Patients with hypopituitarism and dyslipidemia presented deficiency of TSH (69%), gonadotropins (69%), ACTH (64%), and GH (55%) and had a similar number of deficient pituitary axes compared with patients with hypopituitarism but without dyslipidemia. All patients with dyslipidemia (with and without hypopituitarism) had lipid levels well controlled with doses of simvastatin ranging from 20-40 mg/day. The mean daily dose of simvastatin was not significantly different between patients with and without hypopituitarism (26.7 versus 23.5 mg, p = 0.10). Similarly, no significant variation in simvastatin dose was observed between patients with different causes of hypopituitarism, presence or absence of GH deficiency, number of deficient pituitary axes, prior pituitary radiation therapy or not, and presence or absence of obesity. Conclusions: Patients with GH deficiency without GH replacement showed good response to simvastatin at a mean dose equivalent to that used in individuals with dyslipidemia and normal pituitary function.

EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OF CENTRAL HYPOTHYROIDISM VERSUS PRIMARY HYPOTHYROIDISM IN RELATION TO LEVOTHYROXINE REPLACEMENT DOSE.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate levothyroxine (LT4) replacement daily doses in patients with central hypothyroidism (CeH) and compare them with those adequate for patients with primary hypothyroidism (P-HYPO). Methods: We included 53 patients with CeH and 57 with P-HYPO, matched by sex, age, weight, and body mass index, in the period of 1 year. At the time of inclusion, all presented a stable and adequate dose of LT4 for at least 3 months, considering as adequate the dose associated with normal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels and free thyroxine (T4) in P-HYPO patients, and free T4 levels in CeH patients. Results: The absolute daily dose of LT4 differed significantly between the two groups, 103.0 ± 27.1 µg (CeH) and 89.3 ± 32.0 µg (P-HYPO) (P = .017), even after adjustment for age, gender, and free T4 (P = .04). The LT4 dose adjusted to weight was also higher after adjustment for age, gender and free T4 (P = .04), with an average of 1.3 ± 0.4 µg/kg (CeH) and 1.2 ± 0.4 µg/kg (P-HYPO). Sheehan syndrome patients had a lower absolute daily dose of LT4 (P = .001), and patients who underwent pituitary radiotherapy required higher doses (P = .008). There was no difference in the daily dose of LT4 according to other pituitary hormone deficiencies. Conclusion: The results reinforce the relevance of a careful individualization of LT4 replacement in CeH management and the need for new markers for proper LT4 replacement therapy in such cases. Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; CeH = central hypothyroidism; GH = growth hormone; LT4 = levothyroxine; P-HYPO = primary hypothyroidism; T3 = triiodothyronine; T4 = thyroxine; TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone.

NUTRITIONAL AND METABOLIC ASSESSMENT IN OVERWEIGHT PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT HYPERPROLACTINEMIA CAUSED BY PROLACTINOMA.

INTRODUCTION: prolactinomas are pituitary adenomas that express and secrete prolactin. These patients are overweight and the mechanisms are being studied. GOALS: assess nutritional and metabolic status of overweight patients with and without hyperprolactinemia caused by prolactinoma and compare them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: cross-sectional study, patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 with and without prolactinoma: 1) 20 normoprolactinemic (NPrl) with prolactinoma; 2) 23 hyperprolactinemic (HPrl) with prolactinoma; 3) 28 controls without prolactinoma or alterations in prolactin levels. Evaluated through anthropometric, dietetics, and biochemical assessment. RESULTS: of the 71 patients evaluated, most were obese women with macroprolactinomas. All three groups had diets with low caloric and monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) intake, the NPrl group had low carbohydrate (CHO) intake and high lipid (LIP) and saturated fatty acid (SFA) intake, and the NPrl and HPrl groups had appropriate intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). The HPrl group had elevated total cholesterol. HDL cholesterol was below the recommended threshold for most patients. No statistically significant differences were found in anthropometric and biochemical variables among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: most patients with prolactinomas and controls are obese and metabolically similar regardless of prolactin levels. All groups presented low caloric and MUFA intake. Protein, LIP, SFA, and cholesterol were significantly different among the groups, the NPrl group ingested less amount of protein and greater of fat. Snacking between meals and changes of food consumption on weekends was reported by most patients. This is the first study comparing patients with prolactinomas and controls, both with overweight, regarding food consumption and feeding behavior.

Introducción: los prolactinomas son adenomas hipofisarios que expresan y secretan prolactina. Estos pacientes tienen sobrepeso y el mecanismo está en estudio. Objetivos: evaluar el estado nutricional y metabólico de los pacientes con sobrepeso con y sin hiperprolactinemia causada por prolactinoma y compararlos. Materiales y métodos: es un estudio transversal con pacientes con índice de masa corporal (IMC) ≥ 25 kg/m2 con y sin prolactinoma: 1) 20 normoprolactinémicos (NPrl) con prolactinoma; 2) 23 hiperprolactinémicos (HPrl) con prolactinoma; 3) 28 controles sin prolactinoma o alteraciones en los niveles de prolactina. Evaluados a través de estudios antropométricos evaluación dietética y bioquímica. Resultados: de los 71 pacientes evaluados, la mayoría eran mujeres obesas con macroprolactinomas. Los tres grupos tenían dietas con baja ingesta de calorías y ácidos grasos monoinsaturados (MUFA), el grupo NPrl tenía ingesta baja en carbohidratos (CHO) y alta en lípidos (LIP) y ácidos grasos saturados (SFA), y los grupos NPrl y HPrl tenían ingesta apropiada de ácidos grasos poliinsaturados (PUFA). El grupo HPrl tenía el colesterol sérico por encima del valor recomendado, mientras el colesterol HDL estaba por debajo del valor recomendado en la mayoría de los pacientes. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en las variables antropométricas y bioquímicas entre los grupos. Conclusiones: la mayoría de los pacientes con prolactinomas y los controles son obesos y metabólicamente similares, independientemente de los niveles de prolactina. Todos los grupos presentaron baja ingesta de calorías y de ácidos grasos monoinsaturados. Proteínas, LIP, SFA y colesterol fueron significativamente diferentes entre los grupos, el grupo de NPrl ingiere menos cantidad de proteína y mayor de grasa. La mayoría de los pacientes manifiestan picar entre las comidas y cambios en el consumo de alimentos los fines de semana. Este es el primer estudio que compara a pacientes con prolactinomas y controles, ambos con sobrepeso, en cuanto a consumo de alimentos y comportamiento alimentario.

Nutritional and metabolic assessment in overweight patients with and without hyperprolactinemia caused by prolactinoma / Evaluación nutricional y metabólica en pacientes con sobrepeso con y sin hiperprolactinemia causada por prolactinoma

Introduction: prolactinomas are pituitary adenomas that express and secrete prolactin. These patients are overweight and the mechanisms are being studied. Goals: assess nutritional and metabolic status of overweight patients with and without hyperprolactinemia caused by prolactinoma and compare them. Materials and methods: cross-sectional study, patients with body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 25 kg/m2 with and without prolactinoma: 1) 20 normoprolactinemic (NPrl) with prolactinoma; 2) 23 hyperprolactinemic (HPrl) with prolactinoma; 3) 28 controls without prolactinoma or alterations in prolactin levels. Evaluated through anthropometric, dietetics, and biochemical assessment. Results: of the 71 patients evaluated, most were obese women with macroprolactinomas. All three groups had diets with low caloric and monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) intake, the NPrl group had low carbohydrate (CHO) intake and high lipid (LIP) and saturated fatty acid (SFA) intake, and the NPrl and HPrl groups had appropriate intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). The HPrl group had elevated total cholesterol. HDL cholesterol was below the recommended threshold for most patients. No statistically significant differences were found in anthropometric and biochemical variables among the groups. Conclusions: most patients with prolactinomas and controls are obese and metabolically similar regardless of prolactin levels. All groups presented low caloric and MUFA intake. Protein, LIP, SFA, and cholesterol were significantly different among the groups, the NPrl group ingested less amount of protein and greater of fat. Snacking between meals and changes of food consumption on weekends was reported by most patients. This is the first study comparing patients with prolactinomas and controls, both with overweight, regarding food consumption and feeding behavior (AU)

Introducción: los prolactinomas son adenomas hipofisarios que expresan y secretan prolactina. Estos pacientes tienen sobrepeso y el mecanismo está en estudio. Objetivos: evaluar el estado nutricional y metabólico de los pacientes con sobrepeso con y sin hiperprolactinemia causada por prolactinoma y compararlos. Materiales y métodos: es un estudio transversal con pacientes con índice de masa corporal (IMC) más o menos 25 kg/m2 con y sin prolactinoma: 1) 20 normoprolactinémicos (NPrl) con prolactinoma; 2) 23 hiperprolactinémicos (HPrl) con prolactinoma; 3) 28 controles sin prolactinoma o alteraciones en los niveles de prolactina. Evaluados a través de estudios antropométricos evaluación dietética y bioquímica. Resultados: de los 71 pacientes evaluados, la mayoría eran mujeres obesas con macroprolactinomas. Los tres grupos tenían dietas con baja ingesta de calorías y ácidos grasos monoinsaturados (MUFA), el grupo NPrl tenía ingesta baja en carbohidratos (CHO) y alta en lípidos (LIP) y ácidos grasos saturados (SFA), y los grupos NPrl y HPrl tenían ingesta apropiada de ácidos grasos poliinsaturados (PUFA). El grupo HPrl tenía el colesterol sérico por encima del valor recomendado, mientras el colesterol HDL estaba por debajo del valor recomendado en la mayoría de los pacientes. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en las variables antropométricas y bioquímicas entre los grupos. Conclusiones: la mayoría de los pacientes con prolactinomas y los controles son obesos y metabólicamente similares, independientemente de los niveles de prolactina. Todos los grupos presentaron baja ingesta de calorías y de ácidos grasos monoinsaturados. Proteínas, LIP, SFA y colesterol fueron significativamente diferentes entre los grupos, el grupo de NPrl ingiere menos cantidad de proteína y mayor de grasa. La mayoría de los pacientes manifiestan picar entre las comidas y cambios en el consumo de alimentos los fines de semana. Este es el primer estudio que compara a pacientes con prolactinomas y controles, ambos con sobrepeso, en cuanto a consumo de alimentos y comportamiento alimentario (AU)